http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com/2016/11/kingcast-and-mortgage-movies-update-on.html
Wednesday, November 9, 2016
KingCast and Mortgage Movies Update on the “Original” Deutschebank Note that Will Eidson Refused to Allow me to See.
Deutschebank v. John E. and Shelly A. Erickson Washington
1st District Ct App. No. 73833-0-1 — full hearing video and hallway video coming tomorrow.
Y’all remember former Stoel Rives Attorney Will Eidson? He took a powder a year or so ago after my repeated and pointed questioning regarding his clients’ apparent lack of integrity and truthfulness on a couple of cases. See generally Shcolnik and Erickson.
For fun, I’ve included some of last year’s festivities on the overleaf, or jump page. LOL, remember reading a real newspaper?
Well sports fans, we are here today to specifically address the Erickson case that was argued today before the King County Court of Appeals Division 1. Things got very interesting because the Deutschebank entity claiming to have authority to foreclose never provided any sworn declaration about any specific original Note in question. Instead, in the instant case they offered some attorney testimony of sorts from Will Eidson, who rushed me out of the room last fall with I tried to observe a review of the original Note, just watch the video below.
The problem, as I see it…. or at least one of the problems facing Deutschbank in this case is the fact that they never produced the allegedly original Note in a prior related Federal case, and all they have is Attorney Will Eidson Declaration regarding the purported authenticity of the Note they scurried up last year, see link above. But the Appellant homeowner and her Counsel say that the Note they saw last year is not the same Note that was shown as a copy in the prior Federal case.
Speaking of notes, here are mine from today:
Court: Didn’t they have the original note?
Kah: Theres no evidence that they had the original note your honor?
July 2015 Eidson brought it in — he did not testify — he made unsworn statements but none of them establish it was og note nothing proved DB had the note ….[snip] more at the Mortgage Movies Journal link.
source